Probelms and
Hypotheses on the Prehistoric Lal-lo,
- Archaeological Study on the Prehistoric
interdependence between
Hunter-Gatherers and Farmers in the Tropical
Rain Forest -
Hidefumi Ogawa
Dept. of
Philippines Studies
Tokyo
University of Foreign Studies
—v–ñ@ƒtƒBƒŠƒsƒ“A–k•”ƒ‹ƒ\ƒ““‡ƒJƒKƒ„ƒ“‰Í‰º—¬ˆæ‚É•ª•z‚·‚郉ƒŠL’ËŒQ‚Ì’²¸‚ÍAæŽjŽž‘ã‚É‚¨‚¯‚éŽë—ÂÌW–¯‚Æ”_k–¯‚Æ‚Ì‘ŠŒÝŠÖŒW‚Ì—ðŽj‰ß’ö‚ð‰ð–¾‚·‚é–Ú“I‚ð‚à‚Á‚ÄŠJŽn‚³‚ꂽB‚»‚Ì€”õ’iŠK‚Æ‚µ‚ÄAŠL’ˈâÕŒQ‚Ì”Œ@’²¸‚É‚æ‚é“–ŠY’nˆæ‚Ì•Ò”N‘ÌŒn‚̸ãk‰»AŽ©‘Rˆâ•¨Ž‘—¿‚ÌŽûW‚Æ•ªÍ‚É‚æ‚鶋ƕœŒ³A–¯‘°lŒÃŠw’²¸‚É‚æ‚é‘ŠŒÝŠÖŒWƒ‚ƒfƒ‹\’z‚ð‚ß‚´‚µ‚Ä‚«‚½BŒ»Ý‚Ü‚Å‚É”Œ@’²¸‚µ‚½ˆâÕ‚Í7ˆâÕ11’n“_‚Å‚ ‚éB‚±‚ê‚ç‚̈âÕ‚Í‚»‚Ì‚Ù‚Æ‚ñ‚Ç‚ªŠL’ˈâÕ‚Å‚ ‚邪A‚»‚Ì‘¼‚É‚àŠL’Ë‚ðŒ`¬‚µ‚½lX‚Ì•æ’nŒQAŠL‘w‰ºƒVƒ‹ƒg‘w’†‚Ì•¶‰»‘wA‚»‚µ‚Ä“´ŒŠ‚É•ª—Þ‚Å‚«‚éB‚Ü‚½ˆâÕ—§’n‚͉͊ÝΊDŠâ‘ä’nãA‰ÍŠÝ’i‹uãA‰«Ï•½–ìAΊDŠâ‹u—Ëã‚ɂ킽‚éB‚±‚ê‚ç‚̈âÕ‚Ìo“yˆâ•¨‚©‚çˆâÕ‚Ì”N‘ã‚Í‘Š‘ΓI‚É6Šú‚É•ª‚¯‚邱‚Æ‚ª‚Å‚«‚éB‚·‚È‚í‚¿ÔF—L•¶“yŠíŒQ¨ÔF–³•¶“yŠíŒQ¨•F“yŠíŒQI—Þ¨•F“yŠíŒQII—Þ¨–fˆÕ“©Ž¥Ii14`15¢‹Ij¨–fˆÕ“©Ž¥IIi16¢‹IˆÈ~j‚Å‚ ‚éBŒ»Ý‚Ü‚Å‚É“¾‚ç‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚éâ‘ΔN‘ã‚Å‚ÍABP3,000”NˆÈ~‚É‘Š“–‚·‚éB‚±‚ê‚ç‚Ì’²¸Œ‹‰Ê‚𑇂µ‚ÄAæŽjŽž‘ã‚ÌŽë—ÂÌW–¯‚Æ”_k–¯‚Æ‚Ì‘ŠŒÝŠÖŒW‚ÌŽÀ‘ԉ𖾂̂½‚ß‚ÉAˆÈ‰º‚Ìì‹Æ‰¼à‚𗧂ÄA‚»‚ÌŒŸØ‚Ì‚½‚ß‚É¡Œã‚Ì’²¸‚Ì•ûŒü«‚ð–Íõ‚µ‚½B1.ˆâÕ•Ò”N‚ƉÍìŠÂ‹«‚̕ω»‚ð‚à‚Æ‚É‚µ‚ÄAˆâÕ•ª•z‚Ɉê’è‚̃pƒ^[ƒ“‚ªŒ©‚¢‚¾‚³‚ꂽB‚·‚È‚í‚¿ÔF—L•¶“yŠíŒQ¨ÔF–³•¶“yŠíŒQ¨•F“yŠíŒQI—Þ¨•F“yŠíŒQII—ނ̕ω»‚̉ߒö‚ÅAã—¬‚©‚牺—¬‚É‚©‚¯‚ĈâÕ•ª•zˆæ‚ªk¬‚ÆŠg‘å‚ðŒJ‚è•Ô‚·‚Ì‚Å‚ ‚éB‚±‚̕ω»‚Í‚³‚ç‚ÉÀ‘ò‚©‚ç—¬…‚ւ̉ÍìŠÂ‹«‚̕ω»A‚»‚ê‚É”º‚¤ŠLÌW‚ÌŠJŽn‚Æ‚¢‚¤¶‹Æ•Ï‰»‚ւƘA“®‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚éB2.‰ÍŠÝ’i‹uã‚Æ“´ŒŠ ‚Ì—¼ˆâÕ‚©‚ço“y‚µ‚½”•ÐΊíŒQ‚Í‹¤”º‚·‚éÔF–³•¶“yŠí‚©‚瓯ŽžŠú‚ÌŠŽY‚Æl‚¦‚ç‚êA’¼ü‚Å10kmŠu‚Ä‚½—¼ˆâÕ‹ZŽÒŠÔ‚ÅŽ‘Œ¹‚ÌŒðŠ·‚ªs‚í‚ê‚Ä‚¢‚½‰Â”\«‚ðŽ¦´‚µ‚Ä‚¢‚éB
Keywards: Lal-lo Shell Middens, Chronology,
Subsistence, Interdependence between Hunter-Gatherer and Farmer
Introduction
Shell
midden sites containing archaeological materials are located on the river bank
of lower Cagayan River, extending from the mouth of the river on the northern
coast of Luzon Island for a distance of 40 kilometers upriver. Site locations
varies basically in four categories, like river bank, limestone hill, inland
and coastal sand dunes (Fig. 1). Extended areas of the shell middens are also
varying differently, from the small shell midden having 50 meters diameter to
the big one extending 500 meters long, 100 meters wide and two meters deep. But
shell species formed those middens are limited, except coastal middens, shell
middens are predominantly composed by locally called Kabibi, fresh water
bivalve shell. Carbon 14 dating of the shell middens are from 3,000BP to
1,000BP (1).
Standing
on those shell middens, many questions come out; why this kind of big size of
shell middens were formed? How was the formation process? How was the
subsistence of the prehistoric people formed those shell middens? Was the shell
gathering activities subsidiary to their farming? Or, shell gathering was
specialized as their main subsistence activities? How their subsistence
activities like hunting, gathering, fishing, farming were conducted, beside
shell gathering? How the micro-environments surrounding the sites like the
river bank, inland plain, limestone hill and coastal shore were utilized for those
activities? How was the economic, social and political relationships with other
prehistoric groups around the shell gathering people, occupying the particular
place for shell as a subsistence resource?
Having
those questions, we started the research on these shell middens. Research area
is covered from the Cagayan River bank to its eastern inland hilly area. In the
following chapters, we will explain at first the research rationales, and the
general settings of the research area, natural and geological settings, history
of the area including the settings of each archaeological shell midden sites
from the mouth of the river to upstream. And then the results of research will
be shown with the contexts of chronology of artifacts and the prehistoric environment.
The economic and social relationships between the sites located on the river
bank sites and cave in the hilly area infered by the artifacts make us possible
to present the hypothesis on the prehistoric interdependence between
hunter-gatherers and farmers in the area.
I.
Research Rationales
1. Brief history of the research conducted
in Lal-lo Shell Middens.
The
first research of the shell middens in Lal-lo was conducted in 1971 at the
Magapit sites by Israel Cabanilla and Yoji Aoyagi, the researchers of National
Museum of the Philippines. These sites were discovered by chance, during the
excavations of the Cabalwanian sites at the west bank of the Cagayan River. The
vehicles of the research team were supplied gasoline by the Shell Oil Company
at their oil tanks in Appari, Cagayan. On the way to Appari, they found the
shell deposit and pottery sherds beside the national highway No.5 at Magapit,
because the highway was under construction for the widening of road, and
cutting down the limestone cliff beside the highway.
Excavation
of the shell midden in Magapit was conducted in 1971 (Cabanilla 1972), and four
excavation areas of 2x2m square were set (site number:II-71-LL1 to 4) on the
limestone hill of 10 to 20m above mean sea level (M.S.L.). The location of 1971
excavation is corresponding to the location 1 of Magapit Shell middens explored
in 1986 by the national museum team including the author (Ogawa and Aguilera
1992). Red-slipped potteries of different shapes with decoration like dot
punctuation and incision, stone adzes, bones and bivalve shells were collected
by the excavation (Cabanilla 1972). Clay pendant or earring like water buffalo
horn revealed during this excavation was designed to the symbol of the Cagayan
Provincial Museum.
Through
the 1970fs, Israel Cabanilla, Yoji Aoyagi and Roberto Santiago, the researchers
of National Museum, have continued the exploration in Lal-lo shell middens, and
discovered Bangag site, in front of Magapit site, other side of Cagayan River,
and Lal-lo Centro site (Aoyagi 1977). During their explorations, these
researchers recognized already that those shell middens produced two types of
potteries, Red-slipped and Black pottery, and that these potteries were never
found together from the same site. They noticed that it could be the difference
of pottery tradition in chronology (Aoyagi 1973:89, 1974:47, 1976, 1979, 1981,
Aoyagi and Tanaka 1985). Magapit site was
excavated in 1978 by Barbara Thiel, after the research of Arku and Musang Cave
in Penablanca, 80 km south of Lal-lo (Thiel 1989). Rich archaeological
materials were revealed, red-slipped potteries of different shapes, coarsely
made potteries without red-slip, clay ornaments and stone adzes.
In the early 1980fs, Aoyagi had continued the explorations in Cagayan , not only Lal-lo shell middens, but also culturally and chronologically related sites upriver along the Cagayan River, like Carig site, Tuguegarao and Lanna site in Solana (Aoyagi 1983). Richard Shutler, Jr. and the research team of Simon Frazer University also explored the Magaoit site during their study of pottery traditons of the northern Luzon Island (Snow and Shutler 1985). Archaeologists working in the Southeast Asia, Pacific and India visited the site during the conference of Indo Pacific Prehistory Association held at Penablanca, Cagayan in 1985. At 1986, National Museum team and the author started the explorations on the Lower Cagayan River area, including Lal-lo, from the mouth of the river to municipality of Gattaran, about 40 km upriver . The purpose of this explorations was basically same as the present research in Lal-lo. First aim was for the establishment of local chronology in the area. Data of the characteristics of shell middens such as size, depth, location, artifacts and ecofacts derived from each site by the surface finding, could be useful for the establishment of relative chronology in this area. Second aim of the research was to approach to the one of the biggest problems in Southeast Asian Archaeology, contemporaneous existence of the groups having the different technological background. In the research area, Negrito people, hunter-gatherers in Northern Luzon, are living in the hinterland of Cagayan River alluvial plain, and established the economic and social relationships with lowland farmers. How long had continued hunter-gatherers and farmer relationships from the prehistoric time to the recent? Resolving this problem, at the first stage of this purpose, we conducted the site exploration from the alluvial plain to the hinterland in Lal-lo.
Twenty
one shell middens containing the archaeological materials are recognized along
the Lower Cagayan River and coastal sand dune by the exploration (Aoyagi, Aguilera, Ogawa and Tanaka 1986, Ogawa and
Aguilera 1992). Beside this lowland exploration, the hinterland exploration did
not carry out until 1996 because of the political situation of the area.
Artifacts collected from the surface of these sites indicate the several
cultural phases among those shell midden sites. Shell middens which produce
red-slipped pottery(Fig. 4, 5) donft produce black pottery (Fig. 11)at the same
time. Magapit shell middens produce red-slipped pottery, but the other river
bank shell middens like Bangag, Santa Maria, Catayauan site, produce black
pottery. No shell middens produce both types of pottery together. Stone adzes
are almost collected at Magapit and Bangag site, and only one or two fragments
of stone adzes from Santa Maria and Catayauan site. Almost the Chinese ceramics
collected are blue and white from Santa Maria, Catayauan, Lal-lo Centro,
Camalaniugan sites. These shell middens are possibly classified into the
different groups of cultural phases or chronological order. Such as, Magapit¨Bangag¨Santa Maria, Catayauan, Lal-lo Centro,
Camalaniugan. To resolve this chronological problem and collect the ecological
data for the reconstruction of prehistoric subsistence, the excavations of
shell middens started from 1987 in Magapit, Catayauan and San Lorenzo (western
bank of the river, in front of Catayauan site).
The
excavations of Lal-lo shell middens started from Catayauan site. Catayauan
shell midden is thickly formed, site area extends widely, and shell gathering
still continuously performs by village people. The excavation was conducted to
reconstruct the depositional process of shell midden formation, revealing shell
deposit, layer by layer. Shell layers revealed were processed by water
separation and floatation to collect the ecofacts like animal bones and plant
remains. Different species of shells were counted by each piece and percentage
of materials revealed from each layer was calculated. Beside these ecofacts.
artifacts were revealed only black pottery in small fragments. Catayauan
excavation delineated the characteristics of shell midden formation and its
possible depositional process by the disposal of food stuffs and utensils of
prehistoric people(Aoyagi, Aguilera, Ogawa and Tanaka 1988). But new question
came out from the results of the excavation; Did the prehistoric people utilize
those huge amount of shell only for their food stuffs? Ethnoarchaeological
research of the present shell gathering in Catayauan had conducted after the
excavation (Ogawa 1997).
Magapit
shell midden excavations are also conducted in 1987. Excavation spots were
selected at the highest location in Magapit sites. Hill Top site is located at
50 meters above M.S.L., four meters square was set for excavation. 5.5 meters
deep shell deposit was excavated. Cliff site at 25 meters above M.S.L., also
excavated 2 x 2 meters square. Big amount of artifacts and ecofacts were
collected from both excavation spots, such as different types of red-slipped
pottery, jar, bowl with dot punctuation and incision, coarse type of bowl
without red-slip, stove, clay, stone and bone ornaments, stone adzes (Fig. 4`11, Aoyagi, Aguilera, Ogawa and Tanaka 1988,
1991, 1993, Tanaka 1993, 1996, Aoyagi, Ogawa, Tanaka 1996).
Datings
of these shell middens are available; Catayauan site about 1,000BP and Magapit
Hill Top site about 2,800BP.
San
Lorenzo shell midden is located on the west bank of Cagayan River, about ten
meters above M.S.L.. The site was recognized during the exploration in 1988.
San Lorenzo village people, Ibanag and Ilocano, also perform the shell
gathering at the present day. Three shell layers and two silty clay layers were
revealed in 4 x 2 meters square. The deepest shell layer reached to 2.5 meters
and produced the Chinese blue and white ceramic sherd belonging to 16th
Century. Depositional order of shell and silty clay layers, arranged alternatively,
indicates that the flood brought silt to the site, but shell gathering was
continued even after the inundation. Artifacts revealed from the deepest
portion of the shell midden showed that the deposition of shell and silt layers
was quickly performed, during about four hundred years (Aoyagi, Aguilera, Ogawa
and Tanaka 1991, Tanaka 1993, 1996).
In
the perspectives of cultural relationships with other areas in South China Sea
like Taiwan, South China and Vietnam, Stone and Clay pendants from Magapit site
shows its similarities in typology and dating. Unexpectedly some inquiries were
made about the red-slipped pottery from Magapit site by Oceanic archaeologists
in the relationship with Lapita pottery. For the study of cultural
relationships with adjacent area, further research and more data are needed,
but the significance of our results are recognized even at the first stage of
our study.
Shell
Middens in Southeast Asia and South China had been the special issue of study
for archaeologists belonged to the Japan Society for Southeast Asian
Archaeology since 1992 to 1993, and they recognized its importance. Especially,
Lal-lo Shell Middens are noticed as one of the biggest shell middens in
Southeast Asia and South China.
After
three years of research on the shell middens in the Lower Cagayan River,
analyses of findings had continued until the middle of 1990fs. New project has
conducted from 1995 to 1997 in the same research area for the further study and
resolution of old and new questions on the prehistory of this area.
2. The problems and
purposes of the research
Our
researches in 1980fs are limited to the river bank shell midden exploration and
excavation. Twenty one shell middens were explored and three of them were
excavated. Further research must be conducted, not only the sites located on
the river bank, but also in the hinterland, limestone hilly area. Then, new
research term started from1995 for three years. The problem and purposes of the
research is in a same perspective to the previous project.
Problems:When we planed to conduct the Lal-lo Project
from1986, we had the question why the hunter-gatherers still exist until the
present day in this area? It must be possible to suppose that the different
groups having the different technological background, hunter-gatherers and
farmers exist contemporaneously in one area. In the research area, Negritos,
Agta or Ita people are living in the hinterland of Cagayan River alluvial
plain, and established the economic and social relationships with lowland
farmers. Same situation of hunter-gatherer / farmer exchange of food stuffs and
labor was reported in the Sierra Madre Mountain, in Cagayan and Isaberra
Province (Peterson 1978, Peterson and Peterson 1977, Hutterer 1982, Headland
1986). How had the economic and social mechanism of this
hunter-gatherers/farmer relationships elaborated and continued from the
prehistoric time to the recent? It must be one of the biggest problems in
Southeast Asian archaeology.
This
problem has been discussed for long years. Isolate model for this problem was
presented by Heine Gelderun(1932). The reason why hunter-gatherers continuously
exist until present day was explained by the isolation from the influence of
outsiders who have more developed technology. Hutterer appreciates Heine
Gelderunfs endeavor to explain the present situation of the contemporaneous
existence of hunter-gatherer and farmer. But he denied the isolate model,
because intersocial relationships or economic exchange was observed in many
cases of the Philippine Negritos(Huterer 1976). Peterson and Peterson brought
the inter-social relationships observed between hunter-gatherers and farmers
into the prehistoric situation and presented gexchange adaptationh model(1977).
Headland and Bailey individually presented the question of scarcity of
carbohydrate food in tropical rain forest(Hutterer 1982, 1983, 1986, Headland
1987), and advocate that if hunter-gatherers had no relationships with farmers,
they could not find their way to rain forest. They proposed the
ginterdependence modelh of tropical rain forest hunter-gatherers with
farmers(Headland and Bailey 1991). Archaeologists and ethnologists working in
the Philippines have delineated the prehistoric relationships between
hunter-gatherers and farmers in the perspective of interdependence or mutualism
for last two decades. But this model or hypotheses have never tested by the
archaeological materials. Our project in Lal-lo area is conducted to collect
data and approach to this problem for the testing of these hypotheses.
Purposes
of the research:
Resolving and discussing our problem by the archaeological method, the purposes
of the project must be conducted as follows;
1.
to clarify the process of cultural evolution in this research area, from the
beginning of agriculture to the
present.
2.
and to reconstruct the each archaeological phases in the course of local
cultural evolution.
3.
to specify the factors and conditions to promote the system of
hunter-gatherer/farmer relationships.
Archaeological
Method: Archaeological
method to satisfy these purposes is projected as follows;
1. to conduct the archaeological
explorations and controlled excavations at a surveyed undisturbed parcel of land located at the Lower Cagayan
River and its hinterland to elucidate the dating of sites.
2.
to generate the
data which could aid in establishing the subsistence strategy and
palaeoenvironmental data of
the area, conducting the multi-disciplinary research in cooperating with
archaeo-scientists.
3. to delineate the settlement system at the
area based on the function of each sites.
4. to determine the chronological sequence
at the area based on relative and absolute dating.
5. to perform the ethnoarchaeological study
on the inter-social relationships between hunter- gatherers and lowlanders, and
also on the shell gathering system.
6. to refer the historical documents of
missionaries and colonial officers on the mutual activities between hunter-gatherers and lowlanders.
7. to build up the most possible models to infer
the systems existed in the prehistoric time, using the data collected by the above mentioned
archaeological methods.
IIDLower Cagayan River; natural
settings, history and shell middens.
1. Characteristics of Shell Middens
Cagayan Valley is surrounded by the
three mountain ridges, Sierra Madre, Caraballo, and Cordillera. Cagayan River
flows from Nueva Viscaya and acrosses Isabela, Cagayan Province, and empties
into the Babuyan Channel. Shell middens are located along the Cagayan River,
from the mouth to 40 km upriver. So far more than 20 shell middens and one cave
are recognized as archaeological sites.
These
shell middns are categorized into five groups by its geological location; 1) on
the limestone hill beside the river, 50 meters above M.S.L. (Magapit, Bangag
II), 2) river bank shell middens, five to eight meters above M.S.L.(Dummon,
Gattaran Centro Sur, Aggunetan, Aguiguican, Bangag, San Lorenzo, Alaguia,
Catugan, Santa Maria, Catayauan, Tucalana, Lal-lo Centro, Dugo, Camalaniugan
Cenro), 3) inland shell middens, one to two kilometers east from river bank,
seven to eight meters above M.S.L.(Bagumbayan, Dalaya, Catayauan II), 4)
limestone hill cave, four kilometers away from river bank, 40 meters above
M.S.L. (Mabangog), 5) sea shore sand dune shell middens, 0 to five meters above
M.S.L.(Aparri).
The limestone hill shell midden (Magapit
site) and river bank shell middens (Catayauan site) are mentioned already at
the brief history of the research. Inland shell middens are so far recognized
three sites. Although the excavation of the sites are not yet performed,
pottery sherds and polished stone adzes were not collected during the site
reconnaissance survey. There is the possibility that these shell middens had
formed before the appearance of pottery in the area.
2. Scenery of shell middens
The
explanation of natural settings and history of research area start from the
mouth of Cagayan River. River delta is developed on the east bank from the
mouth of river to 10 km upriver. Limestone formation stops at the boundary of
delta. It is supposed that the boundary of delta and limestone had been the sea
shore before the delta developed(Ooi 1996:personal communication). The width of
river is 1.5 km at the mouth and 1.25 km at the boundary.
The
town of Camalaniugan was built at the boundary of delta and limestone
formation. The bell of Camalaniugan Church has the date of 1597(National
Historical Institute 1993). Juan de Salcedo and Don. Juan Ronquillofs
expedition in the northern Luzon had performed since 1572. After the suppress
of two times of rebellions raised in the Lower Cagayan River, Dominicans had
engaged in missionary work from 1596. The tower to keep watch the raiders or
pirates making attack from the mouth of river has been built situated on the
river bank, in Camalaniugan Centro, 200 meters north of the church. The ruin of
the Watch Tower remained as a historical marker of Spanish time. Shell deposit
extends about 500 meters long, 50 meters wide, in the town of Camalanugan
Centro. Chinese blue and white porcelain sherds were collected from the surface
ground. Shell gathering has been performed by Ibanag people of this town.
Dugo
shell midden is situated on the former river bank, one kilometers south of
Camalaniugan Centro, along the west side of National Highway No. 5. Present
river bank is formed about 500 meters east of the site. Cortez site, one of the
location to be excavated by National Museum. The excavation indicates that the
shell deposit showed more than one meter deep(Orogo 1980).
Water
level of Cagayan River is affected by the raise and fall of sea tide. Water
control of the Coast and Geodetic Survey measures the difference of low and
high tide water level as 155 cm every six hours 42 minutes(Bureau of Coast and
Geodetic Survey 1971, 1982).
Lal-lo
Centro is located seven kilometers south upriver. The river width here becomes
narrower, but it measures about 800 meters. Alluvial plain of Lal-lo extends
two or three kilometers on the east bank, and the limestone formation
continuing from Camalaniugan to southward retreats here and comes out at
Magapit on the river bank. On the alluvial plain, paddy field extends now a
day. Shell deposit extending area is recognized as 500 meters long, 100 meters
wide and two meters deep. Stratigraphy of shell deposit is observed on the wall
of well drilled in the town.
Town
of Lal-lo had been called as Nueva Segovia, and capital of Cagayan province
until 1839. Nueva Segovia was originally built by Juan Pablo Carion in 1582
during the first era of Spanish expedition (Morga 1966F52, 302-3, Keesing 1962:168-181). Defeating
the Chinese and Japanese pirates at the mouth of river, Carion secured the
first Spanish settlement on the lower Cagayan River. Nueva Segovia became a
administration, military, economy and religious center of present three
provinces, Cagayan, Isaberra and Nueva Viscaya. But in 1755, diocese was
transferred to Vigan, Ilocos Sur, and the capital of Cagayan also transferred
to Tuguegarao, present capital of Cagayan, in 1839iNational Historical Institute 1993:81, 124).
The economic and political importance of Nueva Segovia had lost gradually, now
it is called by its Ibanag name, Lal-lo.
Historic
documents indicate that the first settlement of Nueva Segovia built by Carion
was located at eight miles from the river mouth. Eight miles is equivalent to
13 km(Morga 1966, Keesing 1962). But at present, it measures 17 km from the
river mouth to Lal-lo. If the historic records are correct, why does generated
the four kilometers difference for 400 years. After 400 years, if the delta had
developed for four kilometers, the rate of delta development must be one
kilometer for one hundred years.
According
to the research of palinology and geology group, before the delta was formed,
limestone hill had been washed by sea tide at Camalaniugan. At the same period,
Lal-lo area of the lower Cagayan River had been swampy, and the river had
flowed slowly(Ooi 1996;personal communication, Aguilera 1996). The beginning of
the formation of delta must be caused by the faster flow of the river, and
washed away the muddy soil of swamp deposited at Lal-lo area to the sea. The
cause of the faster river flow possibly to be derived by the sea level
change.
Ecological
and geological settings of the Cagayan River affect the conditions of shell
habitat, also the formation of shell middens along the river. Shell middens of
research area are formed predominantly by one species of freshwater bivalve
shell, locally called Kabibi (possibly Batissa childreni, Toizumi 1996;personal
communication). The habitat of this species of shell is sandy river bed, not
muddy swamp bed. Then, when the ecological settings of the area had been
swampy, Kabibi shell could not inhabit there, therefore, shell middens also
could not be formed. This assumption must be tested by the further collection
of data on geology and palinology.
Catayauan
shell midden is located four kilometers upriver from Lal-lo Centro. Shell
midden extends 500 meters long, 100 meters wide and two meters deep. Catayauan
village is now populated by about 500 families, 2,500 population and 100
families are Ibanag shell gatherers. Ground surface is covered by shells, and
houses are built on the white shell ground. Shells have been collected and
discarded for long years and huge shell midden are formed. In San Lorenzo and
Catugan village in front of Catayauan also have huge shell middens on the river
bank.
Santa
Maria shell midden is situated two kilometers upriver from Catayauan. In Santa
Maria, the formation of shell midden is different from the one of Catayauan.
Shell middens here have ten meters diameter, two meters deep and extends on the
river bank, every 30 to 50 meters intermittently in a area of one kilometer
long. The different type of the formation of shell middens in Santa Maria and
Catayauan could be caused by the difference of shell gathererfs social
organization, population density or utilization of shells. But the actual
condition must be continuously studied.
At
Magapit, the width of river becomes suddenly narrower, about 400 meters, at
three kilometers upriver from Santa Maria. This is because at Magapit, the
limestone formation across the river and extends to westward, and the river cut
through the limestone formation. Magapit shell middens are situated on the east
bank of the river, in the different locations on limestone hill. Five locations
of shell middens are recognized in 800 meters of distance along the National
Highway. Hill Top site above mentioned produced big amount of artifacts and
ecofacts including red-slipped pottery sherds. The datings of Hill Top site
shows about two thousand years older than Catayauan shell midden which produces
the black pottery.
Bangag
shell midden is located on the alluvial plain on the west bank of the river, in
front of Magapit sites. Site area extends 100 meters diameter and deepest
deposit measured 2.8 meters. The location of Bangag site is alluvial plain
deposited on the limestone bedrock, one hundred meters away from the river
shore. Bangag shell midden formed mound one or two meters higher than the level
of surrounding ground surface. Black pottery produced here has decoration of
incision, hum-like handle, but black pottery from Catayauan, Santa Maria and
San Lorenzo usually has no incision. The limited evidence of black pottery from
Catugan site is similar to the decoration of black pottery from Bangag site.
Even though among black potteries exist the different characteristics, both of
them might belong to the Metal Age pottery, comparing with other Metal Age
potteries in the Philippines.
Other
shell middens are recognized on the west bank of Cagayan River; San Lorenzo,
Catugan and Alaguia. San Lorenzo ad Catugan are located on the river bank, and
face to Catayauan and Santa Maria on the other side of river. Stratigraphy of
shell layers are exposed on the wall of river bank. Alaguia shell midden is
located on the tributary of Cagayan River, and exposes more than two meters of
shell deposit on the riverside. Black pottery is collected from those three
sites. San Lorenzo and Catugan sites are already excavated and revealed two
shell layers on the river bank wall face to the Cagayan River. After having
excavated the second lower level of shell layer, red-slipped pottery sherds
were revealed in the silty clay layer from those two sites. Red-slipped pottery
sherds revealed under the shell layer are also recognized in Santa Maria and
Bangag site. The characteristic difference of red-slipped pottery between
Magapit and these sites is on the decoration; the former has dot punctuation
and incision, but the latter has no decoration except perforation on ring-foot.
But some pottery form is similar, such as Footed bowl type and Jar type
pottery. Chronological order of these two types of red-slipped pottery is still
unknown at this stage of research. But it is interesting that before shell
middens were formed on the both side of river bank, red-slipped pottery had
been used by the people living on the both side of the river. At this period,
the ecological setting of the river was not good for the habitat of shells.
There had been the swampy ecological conditions as mentioned above. With the
collaboration of geological and palinological studies, chronology and
subsistence study of the red-slipped pottery phases will be examined and
studied.
3. Climate and ecological settings.
On
the climate of the lower Cagayan River, the atmospheric temperature is 29.1
degrees at highest(in May) and 23.2 degrees at lowest(in January), and the
annual average temperature is 26.7 degrees. Total amount of annual precipitation
is 2,178.4 mm, it reaches at the highest peak in November, and the lowest in
April (Fig. 2, National astronomical observatory of Japan 1995:136-7,180-1).
The width of the river at the each shell middens mentioned above should be
summarized here; Appari, 1.5 km, Camalaniugan, 1.25 km, Lal-lo Centro and
Catayauan and Santa Maria, 800 meters, Magapit, 400 meters and Dummon, the
shell midden site of south end, 1 km. The sand bars are formed along the lower
river, and at the other side of Lal-lo Centro big sand bar island is developed.
The river activities to bring sand, stone and silt downriver rapidly form the
sand bars along the river bank. Especially after typhoon, sand bars are
developed and emerge different shape. During more than one decade of our research,
sand bars have changed its shape little by little. Even though thus strong
river activity to bring and deposit soil, the depth of the river keeps five to
seven meters at the deepest point.
It
is supposed that the natural conditions of shell gathering ground change
annually or daily. Topography of river bed directly affect to the habitat of
shells and fishes. Every year, from August until November, typhoon changes the
topography of the river bed, and new fishing ground is formed. The sea tide
changes twice a day, sea water comes into the river up to Magapit. The water
level difference of low and high tide is 155 cm at Camalaniugan. The daily
tidal change affects the salinity and temperature of river water, and these
changing conditions affect also the shell and fish habitat. Shell gatherers in
the research area read everyday the changes of those natural conditions and
select the gathering point.
Shell
gatherers say that the tide comes into Magapit, 26 kilometers upriver from the
mouth. It must be caused by the gentle inclination of the river at this area ,
ten meters of level difference for 40 kilometers distance. Our measurement of
salinity of the river at Catayauan village shows less than one percent, even
though shell gatherers say the salinity of river water affect to the habitat of
shells. So far, we donft have precise data of salinity of the river, but it
could be possible to estimate the habitat area of each shell species by the
information of shell gatherers. It indicates that the habitat of three major
species of shells Kabibi, Asisi and ginookan(Ibanag term), is different as
showed in Figure 4. The habitat of Ginookan is smallest, and Asisi can live
widely in freshwater, Kabibi can be gathered from Camalaniugan to Gattaran.
Comparing the population in 1846 and 1948, total population of Cagayan became
seven times(Keesing 1962:216-7). Although eighty percent of population in 1948
was Ilocano, Ibanag population didnft augment so much. Ibanag population growth
rate during 100 years is very low comparing with the high growth rate in all
region of lowland Philippines. This event was derived from the Ilocano
migration to Cagayan and they pushed Ibanag people to the southern region of
Cagayan(Keesing 1962:218-9).
Shell
gathering village population also has been augmented gradually by Ilocano
migration. At present, the population of Ilocano is bigger than Ibanag. But the
shell gathering is performed by Ibanag people. Ilocano usually doesnft perform
the shell gathering except some Ilocanos in San Lorenzo village. Although Ilocano migration
pushed Ibanag people to southern Cagayan, now population is mixed in the
villages of the lower river, even Ilocanos are majority. There must be existed
the regulation mechanism to avoid the conflict in this situation of mixed
population.
4. Shells for gathering and midden
formation.
Shell
middens in shell gathering village is situated on the Cagayan River bank, and
formed predominantly by one freshwater bivalve shell. Other shell species from
middens are two freshwater bivalve, three freshwater conical shell and land
snails. Characteristics of three freshwater bivalves are as follows;
Kabibi(possibly, Batisa
childreni): size of Kabibi gathered varies from six centimeters wide, five
centimeters long and three centimeters high to 2.5 centimeters width, two
centimeters long and one centimeter high. Wet weight of big one with shell
measures 55 grams. Shell middens explored in the lower Cagayan River formed
predominantly by Kabibi. Kabibifs habitat extends from Camalaniugan to Gattaran
(40 kilometers from the mouth of river, Fig. 3), and Kabibi is annually
gathered, even there is the fluctuation of monthly catch amount. Annual catch
amount also shows the fluctuation, such as in 1986 to 87 the amount became few,
but in early 90fs it became a lot. The factors affect the rise and fall of
biomass and the catch amount of shells are still unknown. Kabibi gathering is a
main subsistence ways of shell gatherers in the area, and they sell most of
their catch to brokers living in the village. Shell brokers are usually women.
They bring those shells bought everyday to the towns in the lower river and
sell in the markets. Shell gatherers today usually donft eat shells, therefore
they donft discard shells to form shell middens.
Asisi: Average size of Asisi measures
1.5centimeters wide, 1.5 centimeters long and one centimeter high. This shell
species distributes in freshwater all over the Philippines. In Tgalog, it is
called tulya. Asisi can be collected big amount in one time gathering, but in
rainy season, the catch amount falls down. Shell gatherers tell that they began
to gather Asisi recently, before few decades. And the reason why they began to
gather Asisi is the shortage of Kabibi catch amount. Asisi became the
substitute of Kabibi. Excavation data of shell deposit shows that Asisi is
revealed mainly from the surface ground, but the deeper in layers, the fewer
the frequency(Table 1). Asisi is also gathered for cash. The amount to be
consumed by shell gatherers is also few, but shell of Asisi is discarded in the
village. It is not because that the Asisi consumption by shell gatherers, but
because that shells are removed for selling at higher price. Watching the
surface ground of shell gathering village, new shells of Asisi can be observed.
Ginookan: Average size of Ginookan measures 2.5
centimeters wide, 1.5 centimeters long and 0.8 centimeters high. Its shell is
thin. According to the shell gatherers, its habitat ranges from Lal-lo Centro
to Santa Maria(Fig. 3). The habitat area Ginookan can be gathered is smaller
than the one of Kabbi. Therefore its catch amount is also limited. Quantitative
data of Ginookan gathering and transaction are not yet fully collected. But it
is said that Ginookan has short life, not so strong like Kabibi, and can not
last for two days after having been gathered. So, Ginookan is not appropriate
to sell in Markets far from this area. And sometimes it is served for
self-consumption in a household. It is sometimes processed to remove its shell
by boiling, and sold its meat. The meat processed to halamangh, a local
seasoning. Shells removed and consumed are discarded in the village.
Other
three species of freshwater conical shellsiAgurong, Liddak, Biruko) and land snails are
found from shell middens. But its amount is limited.
III. Results of archaeological research.
Before to start the discussion, it must be needed to summarize the
results of archaeological data obtained from the research of the sites.
1. The research area
extended from the north of the Cagayan River to the northern coast of Luzon for
a distance of 45 kilometers upriver. The sites, so far, revealed by the
archaeological research can be grouped into seven basic categories by its
location and characteristics(Aoyagi et al. 1989:105, Ogawa and Aguilera 1992).
(a) Shell middens along the Cagayan River bank(five
to seven meters above M.S.L.).
Big
size shell middens(extended more than 100 meters, more than two meters deep
of shell deposit);
Santa
Maria, San Lorenzo, Catayauan, Catugan, Lal-lo Centro, Cortez, Camalaniugan
Centro Sur.
Small
size shell middens(about 50 meters diameter, one to two meters deep of
shell deposit)
;Dummon
sites, Aggunetan, Gattaran Centro Sure, Aguiguican, Tucalana.
Shell
mound site:(Shell midden extending in a area of 100 meters of diameter,
situated on the river
bank
sediment but not along the river side, forming shell mound of two meters high);Bangag.
(b)
Limestone hill slope shell middens( 10 to 50 meters above M.S.L.);Magapit
sites, Bangag II.
(c)
Limestone hill burial site(50 meters above M.S.L.);Malanao.
(d)
Inland shell middens(located on the alluvial plain, 7-8 meters above M.S.L.,
1-1.5 kilometers
from the Cagayan River bank);Catayauan II, Dalaya, Bagumbayan
(e)
Shell midden on the river bank of tributary of the Cagayan River(seven meters
above M.S.L.) ;Alaguia.
(f) Cave
site(40 meters above M.S.L., shell midden is formed in the cultural
layer);Mabangog. (g)
Coastal sand dune shell middens(one to three meters above M.S.L.);Appari.
The
excavated sites are eleven localities of seven sites; Magapit(Hill Top and
Cliff site;Aoyagi et al. 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, Tanaka 1993a, Aoyagi, Ogawa
and Tanaka 1997), Bangag(Tanaka 1997b, Bautista 1996a, 1997), Santa
Maria(Irigayen site; Orogo 1995, de la Torre 1995, 1996, 1997, Bautista 1996c),
San Lorenzo(Magundayao site;Aoyagi et al. 1989, Siriban site),
Catayauan(Catayauan site;Aoyagi et al. 1988, Ogawa 1997, Sison site;Garong
1996a, Conciso site:Garong 1996b), Catugan (Dombrique site;Tanaka 1997a, 1998,
Bautista 1996b) and Mabangog Cave.
2. The shell middens are
predominantly composed of one species of fresh water bivalve shell, possibly Batissa childreni, locally
called Kabibi, except at the Appari
sites where the shells are predominantly marine. Local people living on the
Cagayan River bank, like village of Catayauan, San Lorenzo, mostly Ibanag
people, are performing the shell gathering of Kabibi and other two species of
fresh water bivalve shells, locally called Asisi and Ginookan. The supply for
the shell midden formation by the disposal of shells is mostly stopped at this
moment in these villages, because of commercial transaction of shells in the
market places out of village(Ogawa 1997).
The
percentages of shell and soil ratio of shell middens were measured by the
weight in each layers. The results show that the percentages of most shell
layers are ranging from 70% to 95% except the surface of shell midden. High
percentage of shell ratio of midden layers might indicate that the discard of
shells to midden were performed big amount at once.
3. At the river bank sites
excavated(Bangag, Santa Maria, San Lorenzo, Catugan and Catayauan), two
cultural layers are recognized; the upper one is shell midden and the lower one
is silty clay layer. And the shell middens produce the black pottery, and the
silty clay layers produce the red-slipped pottery without decorations. The
difference of these cultural layers is distinctive, so that the typological
changes of pottery or other kind of artifacts, and the changes of ecological
settings and subsistence strategy must be existed between these layers.
4. Results of site
excavations and explorations; As mentioned above, the archaeological sites like
shell middens and other sites, so far, excavated are eleven localities of seven
sites. The materials revealed from these sites are categorized into many
categories, but there are particular relationships between sites and materials
as follows;
(a)Red-slipped
pottery with decorations: Magapit sites produce the red-slipped pottery
with decoration of dot punctuation, carbonate inlay and fine incision on the
lip, rim, shoulder and carinate part of jar type, and lip and inside/outside of
ring foot of footed vessels. This type of potteries are, so far, found only in
Magapit sites.
(b)Red-slipped
pottery without decorations: The river bank sites(Bangag, Santa Maria, San
Lorenzo, Catugan and Catayauan) have two cultural layers, the upper one is
shell midden and the lower one is silty clay layer. The upper layer produces
the black pottery and the lower one produces the red-slipped pottery without
decorations. Red-slipped pottery without decoration shares some vessel form
with the one of Magapit sites, such as jars and footed bowls. But the most of
vessels from the silty clay layers have plain surface, and this is the
distinctive difference of vessels between Magapit and river bank sites. So far,
only the round perforation of bowl type ring foot can be seen both in Magapit
and river bank sites.
(c)Black
pottery with decorations: Shell midden of Bangag site produces the black
colored pottery with incision on the shoulder of jar type pottery. The black
pottery has the thick vessel-wall, and its color must be derived from the
smudging of carbon. After the firing, pots are immediately put into the organic
matters like rice husks, and the carbon oozes out on the surface of pottery.
Catugan site also produce the incised black pottery.
(d)Black
pottery without decorations: Shell middens of river bank sites, such as
Santa Maria, San Lorenzo, Catugan and Catayauan produce the black pottery of
thick vessel-wall. But these black potteries have the plain surface, without
design of incision, and this is different from the black pottery of Bangag.
Otherwise some vessel forms of black pottery such as the footed bowl and jar
can be seen both in Bangag and these river bank sites. In the shell midden of
Catugan site, the sequence of typological change of potteries can be traced;
the lowest, red-slipped pottery without decoration, the middle, black pottery
with decoration and the upper, black pottery without decoration.
(e)Stone
flakes: Chert, andesite, obsidian and limestone flakes are found in these
sites. But the stone flakes are rarely revealed from the shell middens. Some
chert and obsidian flakes are revealed from the silty clay layer of Santa Maria
site. Only Mabangog cave produces a flake assemblage of chert, andesite and
limestone flakes (80 pieces /1E)as shown in the Table 2. For the estimation and recognition of these
flakes as a flake tool assemblage, it is needed that further analyses of these
flakes on flaking technology and functions as tools. These flakes have the
amorphous shape and made by the direct percussion technique. The stone
materials of these flakes are popular in the research area, the geological
setting of limestone formation.
In the
inland shell middens, the artifacts are rarely found, but in Dalaya site, one
chert core and flake were found by surface.
(f) Clay earring
and pendant: Clay earring from Magapit sites are noticed by its water
buffalo(locally calledgTamarawh) horn shape from the first excavation of the
sites, and it became a symbol of the Cagayan Provincial Museum. The cut of
earring is positioned at the upper-most, and the lower half has the heart
shape(Fig. 8). Also Magapit has the oval shape clay pendants which have a small
perforation at the upper portion. Santa Maria site(Irigayen Property) of the
silty clay layer produce the clay earring of the different type of Magapit
sites. The differences between those earrings from Magapit and Santa Maria are
the shape and the position of cut. The shape of earring from Santa Maria is
oval and sideways long, not like water buffalo horn, and its cut is positioned
at the side. The section of profile is also different; Magapit earrings have
the relatively flat profile, but Santa Maria ones have round one.
(g)Stone
ornament: A broken part of a small rectangular stone tablet from which a
segment has been cut(like gslith, was excavated from Magapit Hill Top site(Fig.
10). In Santa Maria(Irigayen site), a stone ornament which has the same shape
but smaller and the different material(possibly jade) used is found from the
silty clay layer. This kind of stone ornament or earring are distributed in the
northern coast area of South China Sea, from northern Vietnam, Taiwan until the
Philippines Islands. Sa Huynh Culture in the Middle Vietnam has the particular
types of earring, and these are distributed in many sites of Southeast Asian
islands at ca. 2,000 years BP. Arku Cave in Penablanca Caves produces one of
the Sa Huynh type of earrings(Thiel 1989, 1990). But the rectangular shape
earrings from Magapit and Santa Maria sites are found in the Bronze Age sites
in the northern Vietnam and the Pinam burial site in the southeastern part of
Taiwan(Sung 1987,1989).
(h)Burials
and Human bones: As mentioned above, Santa Maria site was, at first, chosen
to reveal the primary burial features for the study of composition and sets of
the black potteries. At the last field season of the excavation of Irigayen
site, the burial pit, primary, extended adult human bones and the associated
potteries were revealed without disturbance. On the other side of the Cagayan
River, a primary burial pit was also found in Siriban site of San Lorenzo. This
burial has the human bones of child and black potteries. And both of these
burials were revealed from the silty clay layer. Shell middens in research area
also produce the human bones, but mostly these are fragmental, so that the
burial features were not recognized yet. The disturbed burials were found in
Catayauan(Sison) and Catugan(Dombrique) sites of shell middens, and the grass
beads were collected as the associated materials.
Jar
burial is also revealed from the shell midden(upper cultural layer) of San
Lorenzo(Siriban) site. Some fragmental human bones were contained in the burial
jar. The size of this jar is big, but it can not estimate whether this jar
burial is secondary or primary burial practice.
Two
different funeral practices were revealed in San Lorenzo site, from the
different cultural layers; the primary burials from the silty clay layer(lower
cultural layer) and the jar burial from shell midden(upper cultural layer). The
primary burials with the trade ceramics are also existed in San Lorenzo site,
in the same funeral area. These trade ceramics are celadons, blue and white
porcelains and brown glazed jars, and belong from 14th to 18th Century. These
data on the primary burials with trade ceramics are acquired from the
disturbance of pot hunters to the burials. Malanao site is also the primary
burial site and the associated materials of trade ceramics, celadon, blue and
white and brown glazed jars, belonging to 14th to 17th Century are collected
from the surface ground. Tucalana site is the primary burial site and the blue
and white porcelains are associated. The human bones are also observed in the
soil deposit under the basement of the ruin of the Tucalana Church which was
built by the Dominicans missioned from the late 16th Century in Lal-lo,
formally called Nueva Segovia. No excavation is so far conducted to these
burials, but once start the excavations, the chronological order or the changing
process of these different funeral practices will be made clear.
(i) Iron slags: Iron slags are found in
Bangag and San Lorenzo(Siriban Property) sites from shell layers. These iron
slags indicate the presence of the black smithing in these sites. The result of
components analyses of these iron slags suggests that these are remnants of
iron smelting, its temperature is ranging from 1,200 to 1,300 centimeters
degrees and the raw material is not the iron sand(Uchida personal communication
1997). If not the iron sand, the raw material is possibly the iron ore. It is
informed that the iron ore had been mined at Alacapan, about 10 kilometers
northwest of San Lorenzo. Further research and study on the iron tools
manufacturing features will clarify the prehistory of local iron technology,
and the process of local political/economical development by the accessibility
or monopoly of its resource and high technology.
(j) Stone
adze: Stone adze can be found generally in the sites, both in shell middens
and in silty clay layers, except in the inland shell middens. All adzes
collected and excavated are broken pieces, but it shows same characteristics of
quadrangular section of profile. Some chisels were rejuvenated from the broken
piece of adze. Also many stone adze rejuvenation flakes which have the polished
part on the dorsal surface of flake were found in the sites. By the excavation
of Mabangog Cave, only one rejuvenation flake was also revealed from the
backfill soil of disturbed area of cave.
(k) Ecofacts:
By the 7mm dry mesh strainer and water floatation of sample spots(20 x 20 x
thickness of layers cm), organic matters like faunal and floral remains were
collected. The identification of data will present many environmental
information like its habitat, and these information will indicate the human
activities for their subsistence, such as that the particular
micro-environments provide the unique resources to the social groups, then the
accessibility to these resources will affect to the economic, social and political
relationships among these social groups. The one of the reason of the research
on shell middens is the preservation of organic matters in better condition
than soil matrix. The shell middens produce many ecofacts but the soil layers a
little.
The data
is huge amount, and so far, the identification of animal bones is ongoing. The
problem is the lack of references for the identification, such as plant seeds
and fish bones. For these references, the sample collection must be conducted.
The ethnoarchaeological research on the local hunter-gatherer, shell gatherer
and farmer includes this kind of ecological research.
(l) Trade ceramics: Trade ceramics are
collected from the most of river bank sites. These ceramics can @be separated into two groups. The ones belong
to 14th to 15th Century, the others belong to 16th to 17th Century. Most of
these are made in China, and the former group of ceramics are the Longquan kiln
type celadons, the latter group of ceramics are the Fujian or Guangdong kilns made
blue and white porcelains. Among the former group, there exist the celadon
bowls made in Go Sanh kiln, Binh Dinh Province, middle Vietnam, so-called
gChampa Wareh (Aoyagi and Ogawa 1992, Aoyagi et al. 1992, 1995, Yamamoto et al.
1993), which are recently found, more than 7,000 pieces, in the Pandanan
shipwreck site of Southeastern Palawan Island.
Between
two ceramic groups, there is the lack of one group of ceramics which were
commonly excavated in the Calatagan primary burials, so-called gCalatagan Typeh
ceramics belong to the late 15th to early 16th Century, Jingdezhen kiln type
blue and white porcelains(Fox 1959, 1967, Aoyagi 1991, 1992, Tanaka 1993b).
Both two groups of ceramics are crudely manufactured for the daily utensils.
4. Features: The features
in the Lalo-lo archaeological sites are revealed in Santa Maria(hearth and
primary burial) and San Lorenzo(primary and jar burial) sites. In Santa
Maria(Irigayen site), a hearth, pits filled by shells, a pit discarded wasted
pottery and burial pit are revealed. A hearth and shell pits were found on the
same horizon at the bottom of shell layers and the top of the silty clay layer.
The hearth was made on the horizon of the top of silty clay layer. The hearth
has a structure of shallow pit and a burnt clay structure at the edge of pit.
The hearth pit was filled with ash, charcoal and burnt soil. The feature of
hearth continues from the top horizon of silty clay layer into the shell layer.
The section of profile shows that the pit of hearth has the width of 70
centimeters at the top of the pit. The plan of hearth in the shell layer could
not be recognized during the excavation, but on the section, the profile of
hearth pit in the shell layer could be distinguished and the hearth pit was
recognized its continuation from the upper part of silty clay layer to the
shell layer. In the shell layer, the section of hearth pit profile shows that
it was filled by the burnt shell fragments and both side of the hearth pit
profile, the burnt clay layers were observed. This evidence might indicate that
the hearth was dug in the shell layer and the wall was fortified by clay.
On the
top horizon of silty clay layer, the hearth was surrounded by the mixture of
ash, charcoal and shell fragments. The small pits of 10 centimeters of diameter
surrounding the hearth were also observed. These pits were filled with shells,
so that it was easy to recognize even the small pit plans in the silty clay
layer. The evidence of small pits around the hearth indicates the hut was built
over the hearth.
The pit
of primary burials are needed the big effort to recognize the plan, because it
is not filled with shells. The difference of soil color and contents between
inside and outside of feature could not be easily distinguished in the silty clay
layer. There must be existed the more features in the silty clay layers,
because the artifacts like red-slipped pottery sherds, stone adzes were buried
abundantly and continuously from the top horizon of silty clay layer until one
meter deep. But in the silty clay layer, it is difficult to distinguish the
plan of feature as long as by the eye sight using the criteria of soil color
and contents.
.
5. Cave site; Apart from the river bank sites, the hinterland or hilly
area are also explored and excavated to intend to find the archaeological sites
which have the different characteristics of the artifacts, features and
settlements in the different ecological settings. Mabangog cave, located on the
limestone hill area, about 40 meters above M.S.L., was explored in 1996, then,
the presence of pottery and shell were recognized, and in 1997 , two squares(1
x 2 meters) were excavated.
The
thickness of soil stratigraphy was thin, 20 to 40 centimeters until the
bedrock. The lower layer contained the shell species same as found at the river
bank shell middens. The artifacts such as stone flakes, pottery sherds, animal
bones were revealed from the shell layers. The stone flakes revealed are chert,
andesit limestone flakes and have the amorphous shape and the size is less than
five centimeters. Total of 80 pieces of stone flakes were revealed from two
squares. The estimation of flakes as stone tool, especially limestone, is
needed the technological studies of flaking and the functional studies on size,
position/angle/use-wear of edges.
The
red-slipped pottery sherds were found from this cave. These pottery sherds have
not the decoration of punctuation and incision. This characteristic is similar
to the pottery from the river bank sites, not similar to the one from the
Magapit shell middens. These pottery sherds, stone flakes and fresh water
shells(Kabibi ) were revealed from
the same cultural layer in the Mabangog Cave. This kind of artifacts
composition is the first evidence in the Lal-lo Shell Middens. And this
composition of artifacts arises the questions in the context of chronology of
artifacts and the ecological settings, of Mabangog Cave.
6. Ethnoarchaeological
research on the shell gathering people; The ethnoarchaeological research have
been conducted in the shell gathering village of Catayauan, focusing on their
technique of shell gathering and fishing, and their knowledge on the natural
environment for the model building of the prehistoric subsistence strategy of
shell gatherers. The researchers conducted the interview to each household of
shell gatherers. One hundred households of sixty eight families have performed
the shell gathering activities, and they have four kind of gathering methods.
These gathering methods varies from the using of complex gears to the simple
hand catching. By the difference of age and sex, economic condition of
households, daily changing condition of environment, people choose the adequate
methods. The gatherers sell the shells to the vendors who are mostly the
housewives of shell gatherers. The domestic consumption of shells gathered is
very limited, so that the disposal of shells to shell middens is also limited.
The vendors go to the markets outside of village. The shell gathering is
performed for the commercial transaction or cash income, not for
subsistence(Ogawa 1997).
The
prehistoric catch amount making the shell middens can be inferred from the
daily amount of shell catch of Catayauan shell gatherers. It is supposed by
even the rough estimation of prehistoric catch amount and demography that the
huge volume of shell midden of Catayauan could not be made for 1,000 years.
This huge amount of shell midden could not be made by the consumption of shell
gatherers only for their subsistence. There must be existed the some kind of
processing and exchange or trade of shells, such as the dried shell meat trade
to the other social groups. Comparing with the evidences of the prehistoric
exchange or trade of shells as a specific resource occupied by the Cagayan
River bank people, the models of present gathering activities and commercial
transaction of shells must be elaborated. The ethnoarchaeological research is
still ongoing to gather more information on the subsistence and commercial
activities of shell gatherers for the finer model building of shell gathering
and local exchange network .
7. Shellfish growth line
studies: The growth lines on the section of Kabibi have been studied by
Toizumi. This is the common technique and method in Jomon study of Japan to
reconstruct the shell midden formation process and to reveal the seasonal
variation of human subsistence activities in annual schedule(Koike 1980, 1986).
The result of this study contributes also to the process of shell midden
formation. Once the growth line analyses of shell samples from one layer could
be clarify the season when the shells were discarded and formed one layer, the
depositional history can be reconstructed by the comparison of seasons of the
other shell layers in sequence of stratigraphy. It has been difficult to count
each growth line because the lines of Kabibi are not clear. But when he
abandoned to count the each growth line and pay attention to the recurrent
patterns of dense and coarse concentrations of lines, the three different
patterns of line concentrations could be extracted. The reason of these
different patterns of growth lines
supposed to be caused by the different conditions of natural environment such
as the salinity of water, temperature and feeds. The experimental excavations
for the reconstructive study of the shell midden formation process have been
conducted in Catayauan site(Sison and Conciso sites). The excavation and data
processing have been performed by Toizumi and Garong in the field(Garong 1996a,
b). If the results of analyses on the fuanal and floral data extracted from
shell layers will correlate to the seasonal change of shell layers in sequence,
more detail of subsistence activities might be clarify.
8. Geological and
palinological studies; The research and study on the palaeo-environmental
settings have been needed for the subsistence basis of prehistoric people lived
in the research area. The change of natural settings like river system,
alluvial plains, sea level and vegetation must affect directly to the
subsistence activities and strategies of prehistoric people. The Prehistoric
human exploitation also had changed the natural settings, such as the retreat
of tropical rain forest by the prehistoric farming. If the information of
prehistoric natural conditions can be synthesized with the archaeological data,
we could reconstruct more affluently and finely the prehistory of this area.
The
boring samples were collected from the different geological setting or
micro-environments for this study. The analyses of boring samples are still
conducting, but the important information on the river bank sediment formation
process is presented during the field work. As already mentioned above, the
river bank shell middens are situated on the silty clay sediment, and this
layer has no shell deposit. There is the distinctive difference between the
shell midden and silty clay layer. The silty clay sediment contains red-slipped
pottery, so that this is also the cultural layer like shell midden. But the
reason why the silty clay layer doesnft contain the shell deposit should be
that the shells had not lived when the silty clay layer had been formed. It is
supposed that the area had been swampy environment when the silty clay sediment
had deposited. When the swampy environment of the area had changed to fluvial
by some reason(e.g. sea level progression), the new environmental conditions
was accepted by shells as their habitat. The environmental change from swampy
to fluvial must affect to the change of subsistence strategy of prehistoric
people engaged in the site formations of this area. And the biggest resource
must have been the shell for them.
IV. Discussion and further perspectives.
Synthesizing
the results of excavation acquired from each site, we will extract and discuss
here the problems on the chronology of artifacts and sites, and subsistence
activities or strategies of prehistoric people engaged in the sites formation.
Although the analyses of excavated data are not yet fully finished at this
moment, extracting the problems or questions from the archaeological data, the
perspectives of further studies can be indicated.
1. On
the chronology of artifacts and sites.
In each
site, considering the prehistoric ecological setting, the specific problems of
chronology of artifacts can be discussed differently. The questions, problems
and topics of each site concerning with chronology must be synthesize here, for
the further studies of this archaeological project(Table 3).
(a) Chronological sequence of potteries.
Before
the project was started, the existence of the red-slipped pottery from Magapit
and black pottery from Bangag were already recognized. By the excavation of the
sites, it becomes clear that these potteries can be divided into four types at
least. In Catugan site, the sequence of different pottery types in this
research area could be as follows;
1. Red-slipped pottery with decorations(Red I):Magapit sites, from
shell middens
2. Red-slipped pottery without decorations(Red II):from silty clay
layer of river bank sites
3. Black pottery with decoration(Black I):Bangag and Catugan site,
from shell middens
4. Black pottery without decorations(Black II):from shell middens of
river bank sites
Except
Magapit and Catugan sites, the river bank sites excavated have two cultural
layers of Red and Black pottery; Magapit(Red I), Bangag (Red II and Black I),
Santa Maria(Red II and Black II), San Lorenzo(Red II and Black II),
Catayauan(Red II and Black II), Catugan(Red II, Black I and II). Magapit has
only one cultural layer, but Catugan has three, and other sites have two
layers. The evidences of potteries and its layers of each site can correlate to
one sequence. The evidences from Magapit, Bangag and Catugan can be linked
sequentially and this sequential model can be applied to the evidences of other
sites. Arranging these potteries in the order of sequence, the hypothetical
chronology can be presented as above(Table 4).
The C14 datings of Red. I from Magapit Hill Top site is ca. 3,000BP
and the Black II from Catayauan site is ca. 1,000BP. The sequence of these
potteries could be ranging from 2,000 years(1). When the
datings of other sites and layers will be acquired, the details of typological
changes in the chronological sequence can be examined more finely.
(b) On the Red-slipped pottery from Mabangog
Cave.
Aside
from the river bank sites, Mabangog Cave is located on the limestone hill area
about 40 meters above M.S.L.. The red-slipped pottery without decoration(Red
II) were revealed from the soil sediment on the bedrock of cave. The soil
layers contained the Kabibi shells together with Red II sherds. The Red II can
be revealed in the silty clay layer of river bank sites. But any kind of black
pottery was not revealed. The Red II sherds from Mabangog Cave are similar to
the ones from the river bank sites. The problem is arisen here that the
chronological contradiction of artifacts associations; at the river bank sites,
the silty clay layer produces the Red II sherds, and the shell midden produces
the Black I and/or II sherds. But the shell layer of Mabangog Cave produces the
Red II sherds. As mentioned at the Mabangog Cave, the questions are arisen in
terms of the chronological sequence of artifacts and natural settings.
Q1. How
could be the shell midden formed in Mabangog Cave while the shell middens had
not been formed
at the river bank sites ?
Q2.
Where did the Mabangog Cave people had gathered shells while the river bank
people could not gather
the shells at the Cagayan River because of the swampy ecological and geological
settings at the lower
river area where the shells could not inhabit at that time ?
Here the
chronological problem of artifacts becomes linked with the problems of natural
environment and human subsistence activities. If it is confirmed that the Red
II sherds from Mabangog Cave are made or imported from the river bank sites and
used contemporaneously with the ones from the silty clay layer of river bank
sites, the contradiction of chronology and environmental conditions will arise
between the archaeological data from Mabangog Cave and river bank sites. When
Kabibi could not be gathered in the Cagayan River, where the Mabangog Cave
people had gathered Kabibi ? At present, the Kabibi does not inhabit in the
tributaries of the Cagayan River. But it can not answer at this stage of
research whether the Kabibi had inhabited in the tributaries at the prehistoric
time or not.
Another
problem is derived from the association of stone flakes and Red II sherds of
Mabangog Cave. The Red II sherds are associated with the stone flakes in the
shell layer. The evidences of stone flakes from other sites are very limited,
and the biggest evidence of flakes is revealed from the silty clay layer of
Santa Maria. These are six chert and two obsidian flakes. Mabangog Cave
produces 80pieces of stone flakes and 60 % of those are chert flakes. For one
decade of excavations in Lal-lo, the assemblage of stone flakes have not been
found in the Magapit and river bank sites. The biggest number of flakes in one
site is found, even six pieces, in Santa Maria, until the excavation of
Mabangog Cave. It was supposed that at the beginning of the project, the stone
tool assemblage would be associated with the pottery. This kind of situation is
inferred by the present circumstances of the contemporaneous existence of the
human groups with the different technological background, like farmers and
hunter-gatherers in the research area. But the models of interdependence or
symbiotic relationships between farmers and hunter-gatherers(Headland and
Bailey 1991, Hutterer 1976, Peterson and Peterson 1977, Spielmann 1986) is not
easily corroborated by the archaeological data.
The
chronological contradictions of artifacts(Red II and Stone flakes) and
ecofact(shell) between Mabangog Cave and the river bank sites can derive the
questions on the archaeological contexts. The true aspects of long term process
of the cultural evolution in this area must be more complicated. But for the
next step of the study, the working hypotheses must be presented in terms of
the subsistence activities of prehistoric people both in the river bank sites
and the hilly area.
1. The different human groups with the
different technological background and different way of environmental exploitation existed
contemporaneously and utilized exclusively the environment around the site.
2. And these two groups had the economic,
social and political relationships through the exchange.
3. One human group had used these two
ecological settings properly, then these two sites have the different site
functions for the exploitation.
These
hypotheses can not be tested or confirmed by the archaeological data at this
moment, but in a near future, must be tested through the analyses of artifacts,
ecofacts and datings.
(c) Problem of Black II potteries from the
burial pit of Irigayen site, Santa Maria.
Archaeological
problems concerning to the burial of Santa Maria site have two issues; the
living horizon of prehistoric people to be buried and the subsistence basis of
these people. The first issue is the archaeological data concerning with the
plan of burial pit. To find the plan of features was the most difficult matter
of the excavation of this site. Because the differences of soil color between
inside and outside of the burial pit in the silty clay layer of this site was
difficult to distinguish. The difference of soil was distinguished by the
criteria of its color, contents and hardness. After the long examination and
comparison of the soil, the oval shape of plan of burial pit was found. The horizon
where the plan was found was 30 centimeters below the top of the silty clay
layer, and 60 centimeters below the surface ground. During our endeavor to find
the plan of burial pit, 30 centimeters of depth of soil was removed for the
examination and the comparison of the soil, inside and outside of the pit. Is
it really the actual horizon where the people started to dig the burial pit ?
Examining this problem, the associated materials with burial pit must be
discussed here.
The soil filled burial pit did not
contained the shells or shell fragments. Only one piece of small fragment of
shell was found under the right shin bone. And the Black II potteries were
associated with human bones in burial pit. The Black II is revealed from the
shell layers above the silty clay layer, and silty clay layer produces the Red
II. Both inside and outside of the burial pit contained the Red II sherds.
These Red II sheds must not belong to the time of buried person. So that these
Red II sherds must be dug and filled by the people who buried the skeletal
remains. And these people had used the Black II. Examining these facts and
considerations, it is supposed that the burial pit was dug before the site area
was not used as the disposal area of shells and other garbage for these people.
The people should have lived on the horizon on where they started to dig the
burial pit.
The
second issue on the subsistence basis of these people is concerned with their
living horizon. As mentioned above, when the burial pit was dug, shells were
not scattered around the pit. Only one piece of small fragment of shell was
found in the pit. But the Black II potteries were associated with the human
bones, and again, the Black II usually collected from the shell layers above
the silty clay layer. These fact suggest that the people dug the pit had used
the Black II, but the site area had not been used for the shell midden or the
garbage disposal area for these people. It can not be said that these people
didnft practice the shell gathering and form the shell middens at this time.
Even only one piece of the small fragment, shell was found in situ from the
burial pit. On the process of our excavation of this site, we supposed that the
technological back ground of people used black pottery must be different from
the one of people used red-slipped pottery, because the Red II is not
associated with the shell layers. The distinction is very clear and abrupt
between silty clay layer and shell layer. So that we didnft have supposed the
possibility of the transitional period when the site had not been used for the
shell midden. But there must be existed the period that people had used this
site as the burial site, not for the shell midden site during the Black II had
been used. There is not enough data to answer if the shell gathering had
already carried the part of their subsistence basis or not.
Same
burials associated with Black II potteries were revealed in the Siriban site of
San Lorenzo. These burials also performed in the silty clay layer, and the
primary extended human body. The burials from these two sites located both side
of the river might exist together in the Black II phase. The burials in the
shell layer is not yet excavated clearly as a feature at this stage of
research. But after the Black II phase, the primary burials associated with
trade ceramics are reported in San Lorenzo, Malanao and Tucalana.
By the
excavation of burials in Santa Maria and San Lorenzo, the different utilization
or function of locality by the same people is inferred. It can not be discussed
at this moment where the settlement of these people had been performed.
2. On
the subsistence of the sites.
(a) Typological change of potteries and the
change of river environment.
In the
assumed chronological sequence of the sites, the typological changes of
potteries correlate with the site location and environmental and geological
changes; limestone hill slope site(Magapit, Red I) to the river bank(Red II),
and the silty clay layer(Red II) to shell midden(Black I or Black II). The
latter change is supposed by the results of geology group that the river
environmental setting were changed from swamp to fluvial. The habitat of fresh
water shells like Kabibi is sandy sediment of riverbed. This type of habitat
was caused by the result of river environment change from swampy to fluvial.
The typological change of potteries from Red II to Black I or II could
correlate with the change of river environment. The shells began to inhabit in
the sandy sediment of riverbed, the prehistoric people started to explore the
shells as a special resource in the area.
But when
the typological change from Black I to Black II were caused, people had already
explored Kabibi in the river. The changing sequence of Black I to Black II in
the stratigraphy was observed only in Catugan(Dombrique property) site. Both
type of potteries were revealed from the shell midden. It is difficult to tell
the reason of change between these two black potteries. In the other river bank
sites, the Black I is lacked in the sequence and the Red II are revealed from
the silty clay layer and the Black II are found from the shell midden. The
distribution of Black I is limited in Bangag and Catugan site. But the Black II
is found in the most river bank sites except Bangag. Even the subsistence
activity of shell exploitation was not changed from Black I to Black II, the
demographic change can be inferred by the increase of the number of site.
(b) Magapit and Bangag, original places of
pottery type and its subsistence.
Two
different types of pottery originates at the same locality, on the both side of
the Cagayan River. But the location of these sites are different, Magapit is
situated on the 50 meters above M.S.L. limestone hill and slope, and Bangag is
located on the river bank but not facing to the river and about one hundred
meters away from the river side and forming the two meters high shell mound of
200 meters of diameter. Two sites are facing each other on the both side of
river. The Red I originate at Magapit and the Black pottery originate at Bangag
in the research area. The Red I is found only at Magapit, but Red II is
distributed in the most of river bank sites. This pattern of expansion or
increase of pottery distribution is same to the increase pattern of the Black
pottery. Both types of pottery have the original place and expanded downriver.
When the change had come from the Red to Black potteries, it is seemed that the
expanded area of Red II had contracted to Bangag of original place of Black
pottery. From the inference of expansion and contraction of the distribution
patterns of these two types of potteries, the change of demography and
subsistence strategy could not be discussed at this moment of beginning of data
analyses. But it can be assumed that the typological change of pottery and its
distribution should correlate with the environmental change of river, from
swampy to fluvial.
Another
question is posed on the exploitation of shells at Magapit and Bangag. In the
Red I phase, Magapit people had explored Kabibi but Bangag people didnft form
the shell midden at the phase of Red II. The localities of these sites are
same, only the site location is different. During Magapit people had explored
the shells, the downriver from Magapit could not been inhabited as long as it
is inferred by the present data. After Magapit phase, the Red II had expanded
to the downriver, the swampy area at that phase. Bangag site has also the Red
II in the silty clay layer and Red II is not associated with shell midden. Why
the shell became not to inhabit in the river of Magapit-Bangag area when the
archaeological phase had changed from Red I to Red II ? When the environmental
setting of the river was changed from fluvial to swampy, and the habitat of
shell also changed from sandy to muddy riverbed, did the Magapit people of Red
I phase stop the shell gathering ? These archaeological and geological facts
suggest that when the Red II cultural layer had been formed in the silty clay
layer at Bangag, the river environment of the area could have been swampy. In
the process of typological change of pottery from Red I to Red II, the river
environment could have changed. Then the Kabibi could not inhabit in the river
of Magapit-Bangag area, and the subsistence strategy of people should be
changed. And then another question arises; what was the subsistence basis of
the people who made the Red II pottery. But there is not enough data to discuss
on the question at this moment of data analyses.
(c) Relationship between Mabangog Cave and
the river bank sites.
We discussed already on the questions or problems of contradictions of
the archaeological data from Mabangog Cave and the river bank sites. The
Mabangog Cave Red II sherds are associated with shells, but the Santa Maria Red
II are not. As long as the Mabangog Red II belongs to the same typological
category of the Santa Maria Red II, it can be supposed that Mabangog people had
performed shell gathering in the tributary of Cagayan River, near the cave,
otherwise they went to the upriver of Cagayan River where kept the fluvial
condition and inhabited the shells. But at present, the tributary is not
inhabited by Kabibi. It is more possible that the shells of Mabangog Cave had
been gathered at the upriver of Cagayan river or the Kabibi had been exchanged
with the upriver people. If the model of coexistence of the groups who have the
different technological background, like farmers and hunter-gatherers, could be
applied to this archaeological context, the exchange relationships of food and
goods might be assumed between the river bank people and Mabangog. This kind of
exchange relationships can be observed at present between lowland farmers and
Ita hunter-gatherers in Lal-lo area. The models must be elaborated by both the
archaeological and ethnological data.
Then
again, the subsistence base of Santa Maria people becomes questionable. They
didnft or could not explore the shells. But aside from the shell middens, the
silty clay layer hardly produces the ecofacts. The subsistence activities of
river bank people in the Red II phase must be corroborated by the
archaeological contexts, like economic and social network among these sites.
V. Conclusion.
The
archaeological data have discussed on the topics of the chronology and
subsistence change in the Lal-lo area. The analyses of the collected data are
not fully finished. With these limitations, the problems and working hypotheses
are presented for the further research. The discussion can be summarized as
follows;
1. The chronological
sequence of sites is represented by the potteries from each site as Red I¨Red II¨Black I¨Black II. The change of typology of pottery
from Red I to Red II is not yet certified by the stratigraphy. But The change
from Red II¨Black I¨Black II is recognized in the stratigraphy of
the Dombrique site of Catugan. The Red I, Black I and II are revealed from the
shell layer, but the Red II is found from the silty clay layer. The
distributions of sites along the Cagayan River in each phase of potteries show
the particular pattern. The pattern of site distribution can be called the
eexpansion and contractionf. In the Red I phase, the site, only Magapit is
known, but in the Red II phase, the sites are expanded to the downriver on the
river bank from Magapit. The contraction is appeared in the Black I phase. The
sites of this phase are limited in Bangag and Catugan. And again the expansion
of the Black II sites in the downriver. This changing pattern of settlements on
the river bank, expansion and contraction, could be related to the demographic
and subsistence change.
2. The artifacts are associated
with ecofacts in each site; Magapit Red I is revealed with thick shell layer on
the limestone hill top ca. 50 meters above M.S.L.. The Red II in the river bank
sites are not associated with shell layer, but the silty clay layer.
Typologicaly, these two types of potteries are similar in the form and
manufacturing technique. But the difference of subsistence bases of prehistoric
people between these sites are abruptly occurred. There must be the
environmental change in the habitat of shells in the Lower Cagayan River. The
change from Red II to Black I also correlates with the change of shell habitat
of river. The correlation of changes in environment and typology of potteries
must derive the change in subsistence strategy of these prehistoric people.
3. The Red II sherds from
Mabangog Cave showed the contradiction with the above mentioned correlation
between the river environment and the typology of potteries. In Mabangog Cave,
the Red II sherds are revealed from shell layer, not from silty clay layer like
in the river bank sites. Then the question is posed where the shells(Kabibi) of
Red II phase were collected. In the Red II phase, the river environment of
Lal-lo area is supposed to be swampy, and it is not adequate for the shell
habitat. The Kabibi revealed in Mabangog Cave might be brought from the fluvial
river environment, sandy river bed area, upriver from Magapit at that phase.
Then the another question is how the Mabangog people have gotten Kabibi away
from the Cave. The subsistence bases and social relationships between hilly
area and river bank area people must be considered. The Red II sherds and stone
flakes from Mabangog Cave and Santa Maria site also must be considered in the
same focus of social relationships. The models on the prehistoric
interdependence or symbiotic relationships between social groups with different
technological background have been built by the studies on the hunter-gatherers
and farmers relationships in Palanan, Isabella(Peterson and Peterson 1977),
Casiguran, Aurora(Headland and Reid 1989, 1991). The models must be tested by
the archaeological data from Lal-lo area.
4. The primary extended
burials are found in the silty clay layer in Santa Maria and San Lorenzo. These
burials are associated with Black II potteries. The Black II is revealed from
the shell layers above the silty clay layer, and silty clay layer produces the
Red II. Examining these facts, it is supposed that the burial pit was dug
before the site area was not used as the disposal area of shells and other
garbage for these people. The people should have lived on the horizon on where
they started to dig the burial pit. There must be existed the period that
people had used this site as the burial site, not for the shell midden site
during the Black II had been used. It must be possibly inferred that the shell
gathering had already carried the part of subsistence basis of these people,
but the disposal area of shells had been separated from the burial area by
these people. Same burials associated with Black II potteries were revealed in
the Siriban site of San Lorenzo. By the excavation of burials in Santa Maria
and San Lorenzo, the different utilization or function of locality by the same
people is inferred. It can not be discussed at this moment where the settlement
of these people had been performed.
The
models and hypotheses presented here will be fortified and tested by the
results of data analyses and the further studies. Based on the results of this
research, the further research will be conducted as follows;
1. The further site
explorations in the hilly area; The context of findings from Mabangog Cave is
very different from the one of river bank sites. Sharing the same kind of
artifacts like Red II sherds and stone flakes between these sites, the economic
and social interaction between them can be inferred. For the model building of
the prehistoric interaction among social groups, the data from the hilly area
away from the river bank is necessary for the further study.
2. The further excavations
of river bank sites; The chronology among the different types of artifacts and
the subsistence bases of river bank sites is crucial for the bases of this
study. The sequential change from Red I to Red II is not certified by the
stratigraphic data. The subsistence strategic change from Red I to Red II and
Red II to Black I is also corroborated in terms of shell gathering by the
further research.
3. The geological research;
The reconstruction of environmental history of Lal-lo area will help to
consider the chronology and the subsistence change of each site. The change of
river environment, swampy to fluvial,
could be correspondent to the subsistence change and site formation. In the Red
II phase, the river bank sites has no evidence of shell gathering, but the shell
midddens have been formed after Black I phase until recent. The geological
change of river settings will provide the basic information to consider the
archaeological context. The iron mine and obsidian resource should be
researched by geologist for the economic and social network.
4. The ecological and
palinological studies; This research also provide the crucial information on
the faunal nd floral settings of the researcher and make us possible to infer
the prehistoric natural conditions to be
explored by the people formed the archaeological sites. The basic information
on the shells and fishes, terrestrial animals and plants n the research area
help for the identification of faunal and floral remains from the
archaeological sites. The pollen analysis from boring core samples is now
ongoing for the reconstruction of changing process of floral conditions n the
area.
5. The ethnoarchaeological
studies; The models of interdependent relationship between hunter-gatherers
andfarmers must be elaborated in this research area. So far, the
ethnoarchaeological research on this topic have not been conducted. It can be
inferred that the result of the ethnoarchaeological studies on the shell
gathering people indicates the commercial transaction of shells as food stuff
have been performed with other societies. The shell gathering in the villages
in Lal-lo area have not been performed self-sufficiently. The social groups had
been settled in the different natural setting, such as the river bank, lowland
basin, limestone hilly area, sea shore, etc... But each place has not
sufficient diversity of resources to satisfy the needs of their members
throughout the year. The social network must be existed with outside of their
settlement. The interdependence or symbiotic relationship between
hunter-gatherers and farmers is one of the significant variations of social
exchange of resources. The model built
by this study can be expected to apply to the prehistoric context of this area
for the explanation of long term co-existence of hunter-gatherers and farmers.
Acknowledgment: This research have been conducted by the
Archaeology Division of the Philippine National Museum. This research have been
supported by The Grant-in-Aid for International Scientific Reserach(Field
Research), The Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.
Research Title: Excavation of the Lal-lo Shell Middens (Grant No. 07041006).
Our research is also supported by the people of Lal-lo and Cagayan. We would
like to express our thanks to the following people for their great effort to
help us ; Conciso, Midinaceli, Magundayau, Irigayen, Mapag Family, People of
the Cagayan Provincial Museum and Tourism.
Notes.
1:Two C14dating are available in Magapit Hill Top Site:2,800}140BPiN-5396Chalf
life:5,730”Nj, 2,760}125BPiN-5397, half life:5,730”Nj, one in Catayauan:1,060}290BP(N-5398, half life:5,730”N).
References.
Aguilera, Jr., Melchor
@ 1996
Preliminary Report: Results of
Geomorphological Field Study conducted in the Lower Reaches of Cagayan River. Typescript., Archaeology
Division, National Museum of the Philippines, Manila.
–ö—mŽ¡(Aoyagi , Yoji.)
1985 ¢ƒtƒBƒŠƒsƒ“o“y’†‘–fˆÕ“©Ž¥‚Ì•Ï‘J|ƒJƒ‰ƒ^ƒKƒ“ˆâՂƃTƒ“ƒ^EƒAƒiˆâÕ‚Ì”N‘ã‚ɂ‚¢‚Ä|£wŽOã ŽŸ’j”ŽŽmŠìŽõ‹L”O˜_•¶W“©Ž¥•Ò: 313-330A•½–}ŽÐ (Chronological Studies of Chinese Ceramics
found in the Philippines-on the dating of Calatagan and Santa Ana sites-. Memorial Publication of 77 Years old
Anniversary of Dr. Mikami Tsugio, Volume on the Trade Ceramics.: 313-330.
Heibonsha Publisher, Tokyo. in Japanese)
1991 Trade Ceramics
Discovered in Insular Southeast Asia. Trade
Ceramics Studies No. 3:77-87.
1992 ¢ŒðˆÕ‚ÌŽž‘ã£( 9`16¢‹I)‚̃tƒBƒŠƒsƒ“|–fˆÕ“©Ž¥‚ÉŠî‚•ҔN“I˜g‘g‚Ý|(Asian Trade Ceramics in the Philippines-Ninth
to Sixteenth
Centuries-. Journal of Sophia Asian
Studies No. 10:144-176. in Japanese)
–ö—mŽ¡EM. L. Aguilera, Jr.E¬ì‰p•¶E“c’†˜a•F (Aoyagi, Y., M. Aguilera, jr., H. Ogawa and
K. Tanaka)
1988 uƒ‰ƒŠL’ËŒQ‚Ì”Œ@£wã’qƒAƒWƒAŠwx6:63-104 (Excavations of Lal-lo Shell Middens.
Journal of Sophia Asian Studies 6:63-104
in Japanese
with English summary)
1989 uƒ‰ƒŠL’ËŒQ‚Ì”Œ@(2)vwã’qƒAƒWƒAŠwx7:101-131 (Excavations of Lal-lo Shell
Middens(2). Journal of Sophia Asian
Studies 7:101-131,
in Japanese with English summary)
1991 uƒ‰ƒŠL’ËŒQ‚Ì”Œ@(3)vwã’qƒAƒWƒAŠwx9:49-137 (Excavations o Lal-lo Shell
Middens(3). Journal of Sophia Asian
Studies 9:49-137,
in Japanese with English summary)
Aoyagi, Y. M. L. Aguilera, Jr. H. Ogawa and K.
Tanaka
1993 Excavation of Hill Top
Site, Magapit Shell Midden in Lal-lo Shell Middens, Northern Luzon,
Philippines. Man and Culture in Oceania
9:127-155.
–ö—mŽ¡E¬ì‰p•¶E“c’†˜a•F(Aoyagi, Y., Ogawa, H. and Tanaka, K.)
1996 ¢ƒtƒBƒŠƒsƒ“–k•”, ƒ}ƒKƒsƒbƒgŠL’Ë‚Ì”Œ@‚Æo“y‘•g‹ï£A‘•ª’¼ˆê涕Ďõ‹L”O˜_•¶W@—«–ÎŒ¹•ÒwƒqƒgEƒ‚ƒmEƒRƒgƒo‚Ì l—ÞŠwx: 372-383AŒc—FŽÐ@(Magapit Shell Midden Excavation and its
Ornaments.in Special Issue for the Eighty eight years anniversary
of Dr. Kokubu, Naoichi. Ryu Mogen(ed.)
Anthropology of Man, Material and Language: 372-389. Keiyusha, Tokyo. in Japanese)
–ö—mŽ¡E¬ì‰p•¶(Aoyagi, Yoji and Hidefumi Ogawa )
1992 ¢ƒxƒgƒiƒ€“©Ž¥Ší‚Ì•Ò”N“IŒ¤‹†‚ƌ×qš¬‚Ì’²¸•ñ|ƒxƒgƒiƒ€‚̌×qš¬‚Æ–fˆÕ`ƒ”ƒ@ƒ“ƒhƒ“‚ð–K‚Ë‚Ä|£w“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃ Šwx12: 58-74 (The Chronological Study of
Vietnamese Wares and the Old Kilns-the Explorations of Old Kilns and Old
Trading Port, Van Don-. Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology
12:58-74, in Japanese)
Aoyagi, Yoji, Gakuji Hasebe, Asako Morimoto,
Shiro Momoki, Hidefumi Ogawa
1992 Archaeological Research
of Old Kiln Site in Vietnam-Preliminary Report-. Journal of East-West Maritime Relations 2:
–ö—mŽ¡EX–{’©ŽqE¬ì‰p•¶E“c’†˜a•F(Aoyagi, Yoji, Asako Morimoto, Hidefumi Ogawa,
Kazuhiko Tanaka)
1995 ¢ƒxƒgƒiƒ€’†•””Ȃ̈âÕ’²¸‚ÆlŒÃŠw“I‰Û‘è£w“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃŠwx15: 58-83 (Archaeological Researchin the
Middle Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology
15: 58-83 in Japanese)
Bautista, Angel
1996a Animal/Human Remains from Bangag I,
Lal-lo, Cagayan. Typescript, National Museum, Manila.
1996b Animal Remains from Dombrique Site,
Catugan, Lal-lo, Cagayan. Typescript, National Museum, Manila.
1996c Field Report on Lal-lo Archaeology
Project, August-September 1996. Typescript, National Museum, Manila.
1997 Zooarchaeological
materials from Bangag Archaeological Site. Typescript, National Museum, Manila.
Cabanilla, I.
1972 Neolithic
Shellmound of Cagayan: The Lal-lo Excavation. Field Report #1, Archaelogy
Division, National Museum
of the Philippines, Manila.
de la Torre, Amalia
1995 Brief Report: The
Lal-lo, Cagayan Archaeological Project 1995. Type script, National Museum,
Manila.
1996 Brief Report: Cagayan
Valley Archaeological Project, Santa Maria, Lal-lo, Cagayan from February 7 to
March 3, 1996. Typescript, National Museum,
Manila.
1997 Rapid Cave Assessment
Report of Mabangog Cave located at San Mariano, Lal-lo, Cagayan. Typescript,
National Museum, Manila.
Fox , Robert
1959 The Calatagan
Excavation: Two 15th Century Burial site in Batangas, Philippines. Philippine Studies. Vol. 7, No. 3: 25-390.
1967 The Archaeological
Record of Chinese Influences in the Philippines. Philippine Studies. Vol. 15, No.
1: 41-62.
Garong, Ame M.
1996a A Report on the Archaeological
Excavation in Fausto Sison Sr., Shell Midden Site in Barangay Catayauan,
Lal-lo, Cagayan. Typescript,
National Museum, Manila.
1996b Progress Report on the 1996
Archaeological Excavation of the Conciso Property Shell Midden Site in Brangay
Catayauan, Lal-lo, Cagayan.
Typescript, National Museum, Manila.
Headland, T. N.
1986 Why
Foragers Do Not Become Farmers: A Historical Study of a Changing Ecosystem and
Its Effect on a Negrito Hunter-Gatherer Group in the
Philippines. 2vols.Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. University, Microfilms
International, Ann Arbor.
1987 The
wild yam question: How well could independent hunter-gatherers live in a
tropical rain forest ecosystem? Human
Ecology 15:
463-491.
Headland, T. N. and R. C. Bailey
1991 Introduction:Have
Hunter-Gatherers Ever Lived in Tropical Rain Forest Independently of
Agriculture? Human Ecology Vol.19: 2: 115-122
Headland, T. N. and L. A. Reid
1989 Hunter-gatherers
and their neighbor from prehistory to the present. Current Anthropology 30:43-66.
1991 Holocene
foragers and interethnic trade: A critique of the myth of isolated independent
hunter-gatherers. in Gregg, S. A. (ed.)
Between Bands and States: 333-340.
Center for Archaeological Investigations. Southern Illinois University at
Carbondale. Occasional Paper No.9.
Hutterer, K.
1976 An
Evolutionary Approach to the Southeast Asian Cultural Sequence. Current Anthropology 17: 221-242.
1982 Interaction
Between Tropical Ecosystem and Human Foragers: Some General Considerations.
Working Paper. Honolulu: Environment and
Policy Institute, East-West Center. Hawaii.
1983 The
natural and cultural history of Southeast Asian agriculturre. Ecological and
evolutionary considerations. Anthropos
78: 69-212.
Koike, Hiroko
1980 Seasonal Dating by
Growth-line Counting of the Clam meretrix
lusolia. The University Museum,
The
University of Tokyo, Bulletin 18.
1986 Prehistoric Hunting
Pressure and Paleobiomas: An Environmental Reconstruction and Archaeozoological
Analysis of a Jomon Shellmound
Area. in Akazawa, T. and C. M. Aikens(eds.) Prehistoric
Hunter-Gatherers in Japan. University of Tokyo Press.
¬ì‰p•¶(Ogawa, Hidefumi)
@ 1996 wŽë—ÂÌW–¯ƒlƒOƒŠƒg‚ÌlŒÃŠw|‹¤¶ŠÖŒW‚ª’ñ‹N‚·‚é”–â‘è|x ƒXƒ`ƒ…ƒA[ƒg ƒwƒ“ƒŠ(•Ò)wÌWŽë—–¯‚ÌŒ»ÝxF183-222, Œ¾‘pŽÐ (Archaeology of the Negrito Hunter-Gatherers
- the archaeological problems on the Symbiotic, Interdependent relationships between
Hunter-gatherers and Farmers. Henry Stuart(ed.) Gatherer-Hunter, Today : 183-222. Gensosha. Tokyo. in Japanese)
1997 ¢ŠL’Ë^…“`à|ƒtƒBƒŠƒsƒ“Aƒ‹ƒ\ƒ““‡–k•”ƒJƒKƒ„ƒ“‰Í‰º—¬ˆæ‚É‚¨‚¯‚éŠLÌW–¯‚Ì–¯‘°lŒÃŠw£ w“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃŠwx 17:119-166(Shell
Midden was made by the Noahchian Deluge.-Ethnoarchaeology of the Shell Middens
and Shell Gatherers in the Lower Cagayan
River, Northern Luzon, Philippines- .
Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology 17: 119-166. in Japanese)
Ogawa, H. and M. L. Aguilera, Jr.
1992 Data Report on the
Archaeological Explorations in the Lower Cagayan River, Northern Luzon,
Philippines. Journal of Institute of Religion
and Culture 10: 41-113, Kokushikan University, Tokyo.
Orogo, Alfredo
1995 Preliminary Report:
Result: Result of Archaeological Exploration and Excavation conducted at
Lal-lo, Cagayan Province, July 28 to August
26, 1995. Typescript, National Museum, Manila.
Peterson, J. T.
1978a The Evolution of Social Boundary.
University of Illinois Press.
1978b
Hunter-Gatherer / Farmer Exchange. American
Anthropologist 80: 355-371
Peterson, J. T. and W. Peterson
1977 Implications
of Contemporary and Prehistoric Exchange Systems. in J. Allen, J. Golson and R.
Jones (eds.) Sunda and Sahul.: 567-599.
Academic Press.
Spielmann, K.A.
1986 Interdependence
among Egalitarian Societies. Journal of
Anthropological Archaeology No.5: 279-312.
‘v•¶ŒO(Song Wen Xun)
1987 ¢‘ä˜po“y‚Ì‚¯‚ÂóŽ¨ü‚è£w“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃŠwx7: 14-17@(Earrings with cut from Taiwan. Journal
of Southeast Asian Archaeology 7:
14-17. in Japanese).
1989 On the Prehistoric
earrings with cut from Taiwan and South China Sea Area. (in Chinese). Taipei.
Snow, B. A. and R. Shutler, Jr.
1985 The Archaeology of Fuga Moro Island. San Carlos University, Cebu.
“c’†˜a•F(Tanaka, Kazuhiko)
1993a uƒtƒBƒŠƒsƒ“Š®V¢Eæ“SŠí•¶‰»•Ò”NŒ¤‹†˜àvw“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃŠw‰ï‰ï•ñx13: 173-209. (The Chronological Study of the Pre-Iron
Cultures of the Philippines during the Holocene - A review and a perspective-. Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology 13: 173-209.
in Japanese)
1993b ¢ƒ‹ƒ\ƒ““‡’†•”A•æ’nˆâÕo“y‚ÌŒðˆÕ“©Ž¥Ší‚Æ“yŠí|15¢‹IŒã”¼‚©‚ç16¢‹I‘O”¼‚Ì“ì•”ƒ^ƒKƒƒO’n•û ‚Ì—l‘Š|£w–fˆÕ“©
Ž¥Œ¤‹†xNo. 13: 65-86
(Trade Ceramics and Pottery Excavated in the Cemeteries in Central
Luzon-Aspects of Trade Ceramics and Pottery of the
Latter Half of the 15th Century to the Former Half of the 16th Century in
Southern Tagalog Region-. Journal of
Trade Ceramics Studies No.
13: 65-85. in Japanese)
1996 ¢ƒ‹ƒ\ƒ““‡–k•”‚É‚¨‚¯‚é•ûŠpΕ€‚É”º‚¤“yŠí‚ÌŒŸ“¢|’¾ö‚É‚æ‚é˜A‘±•HŒ`•¶“yŠí‚ÌŒŸ“¢|£w“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃŠwx16: 149-160@ (The
Typological Analysis of the Pottery associated with the Quadrangular Stone
Adzes excavated in Northern Luzon - The analysis of the
pottery with the incised diamond pattern and a
circular impression in each diamond pattern-. Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology 16: 149-160. in Japanese)
1997a ¢ƒJƒgƒDƒKƒ“ŠL’Ë‚Ì”Œ@’²¸£w“Œ“ìƒAƒWƒAlŒÃŠwx17: 210-225@(Preliminary Report of the Excavation of
Catugan Shell-midden, Lal-lo
Cagayan, Philippines. Journal of Southeast
Asian Archaeology 17: 210-225, in Japanese)
1997b The
Kite Photography of Bangag I Shell-midden Site, Lal-lo, Cagayan, Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Archaeology 17:
197- 209.
1998 Preliminary Report of the Archaeological
Excavation of Catugan Shell-midden (Dombrique Site), Lal-lo, Cagayan,
Philippines. wç—tŒhˆ¤’ZŠú‘åŠw‰“™‹³ˆç‰È‹I—vx‘æ20†F149-177
Thiel, B.
1989 Excavations at the
Lal-lo Shellmiddens, Northern Luzon, Philippines. Asian Perspectives 27, No. 1:71-94.
1990 Excavations at Arku
Cave, Northern Luzon, Philippines. Asian
Perspectives 27, No. 2: 229-264.
ŽR–{M•vE’·’J•”ŠyŽ¢E–ö—mŽ¡E¬ì‰p•¶(Yamamoto, Nobuo, Gakuji Hasebe, Yoji Aoyagi,
Hidefumi Ogawa)
1993 ¢ƒxƒgƒiƒ€“©Ž¥‚Ì•Ò”N“IŒ¤‹†‚ƃ`ƒƒƒ“ƒpŒÃ—q‚Ì”Œ@’²¸£wã’qƒAƒWƒAŠwx11: 163-180 (The Chronological Study of
Vietnamese Wares
and the Excavation of the Old Kiln Site in Champa. The Journal of Sophia Asian Studies 11: 163-180 in Japanese)